This story additionally ran on NPR. This story might be republished at no cost (details).
After Elizabeth Moreno had again surgical procedure in late 2015, her surgeon prescribed an opioid painkiller and a follow-up drug check that appeared routine — till the lab slapped her with a invoice for $17,850.
A Houston lab had examined her urine pattern for a constellation of authorized and illicit medicine, lots of which, Moreno stated, she had by no means heard of, not to mention taken.
“I was totally confused. I didn’t know how I was going to pay this,” stated Moreno, 30, who’s ending a level in training at Texas State University in San Marcos and is pregnant with twins.
Related: ‘Bill Of The Month’: A College Student’s $17,850 Drug Test
Do you’ve got an exorbitant or baffling medical invoice? Join the KHN and NPR’s Bill-of-the-Month Club and inform us about your expertise. We’ll characteristic a brand new one every month.
Her invoice exhibits that Sunset Labs LLC charged $four,675 to examine her urine for a slew of various kinds of opioids: $2,975 for benzodiazepines, a category of medication for treating anxiousness, and $1,700 extra for amphetamines. Tests to detect cocaine, marijuana and phencyclidine, an unlawful hallucinogenic drug often known as PCP or angel mud, added $1,275 extra.
The lab additionally billed $850 to check for buprenorphine, a drug used to deal with opioid dependancy, and tacked on an $850 price for 2 checks to confirm that no one had tampered along with her urine specimen.
Total invoice: $17,850 for lab checks that her insurer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, refused to cowl, apparently as a result of the lab was not in her insurance coverage community. The insurer despatched Moreno an “explanation of benefits” that claims it will have valued the work at simply $100.92.
Moreno’s father, in a grievance to the Texas legal professional basic’s workplace in regards to the invoice, recognized the Houston surgeon who ordered the pricey check as Dr. Stephen Esses. His workplace advised Kaiser Health News the surgeon would haven’t any remark.
Sunset Labs is a part of a community of ache clinics and different medical companies based by Houston anesthesiologist Phillip C. Phan, in keeping with Texas secretary of state filings and court docket data. Court data say Phan’s firms additionally personal the ability the place Moreno had her operation.
Three consultants interviewed by KHN stated the lab grossly overcharged; in addition they doubted the necessity for the check.
“This just blows my mind,” stated Jennifer Bolen, a former federal prosecutor and lab and ache administration advisor. “It’s very high and incredibly out of the norm.”
Dan Bowerman, a medical fraud professional, known as the lab invoice “outrageous” and “unconscionable” and stated it ought to have prompted an investigation.
“Sounds real fishy,” added Charles Root, a veteran trade adviser. He questioned if the lab had “misplaced the decimal point,” as a result of such a check ought to value a couple of hundred , tops.
The lab disagrees.
Sunset’s billings “are in line with the charges of competing out-of-network labs in the geographical area,” lab legal professional Justo Mendez stated in an emailed assertion.
Mendez stated ache docs agree that in depth urine testing is “the best course of action” and that a lab “is not in the position” to query checks ordered by a health care provider.
Urine testing for sufferers with power ache has grown explosively over the previous decade amid a rising loss of life toll from opioid abuse. Pain docs say drug testing helps them be sure sufferers are taking the medicine as prescribed and never mixing them with unlawful substances.
Yet the testing growth prices billions of yearly and has raised issues that some labs and docs run urine checks needlessly — or cost exorbitant charges — to spice up income.
Some insurers have refused to pay, which may go away sufferers like Moreno threatened with ruinously excessive payments that they had no thought that they had incurred.
“Surprise bills larded with unexpected expenses and little explanation inflict sticker shock on vulnerable patients,” stated James Quiggle, communications director of the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, whose members embody insurers, shopper teams and authorities companies. Quiggle stated many “puffed-up bills straddle a fine line between abuse and outright fraud.”
Moreno stated her insurance coverage lined the disc elimination surgical procedure in December 2015. She stated the operation went properly and she or he weaned off the hydrocodone ache tablets. To her shock, on a second return a couple of month later, the surgeon’s workplace requested her to go away a urine pattern.
“I didn’t think anything of it,” Moreno stated of the check. “I said fine, whatever.”
More than a yr later, she stated, the lab phoned whereas she was driving and requested her to pay the $17,850 invoice. The lab then despatched her an bill, dated March 10, 2017, which states: “[B]ased upon information from your health plan, you owe the amount shown.”
(Story continues beneath.)
Luckily, her father, Dr. Paul Davis, was visiting her in Texas on the time. Davis, 66, is a retired household follow physician from Findlay, Ohio.
Davis doubted the necessity for the check, to not point out what he thought was a sky-high value. He stated the University of Findlay, the place he helped prepare doctor assistants, gave candidates a primary drug check at a value of $174, whereas the native juvenile courts in Ohio paid $10 for a easy drug display.
Fearing it will damage his daughter’s credit score scores, Davis stated, he known as Sunset and settled the invoice in April 2017 by paying $5,000, which he stated he now regrets. The lab despatched Moreno a receipt that stated it discounted her invoice due to “financial need/hardship.”
Asked for remark, Blue Cross spokesman James Campbell stated he couldn’t talk about a particular case however famous:
”We are dissatisfied in addition to involved about transparency at any time when [any] member is shocked by an extreme cost for a seemingly routine service or acquired providers that won’t have been medically essential.”
Campbell additionally stated the lab was out-of-network and “we do not control how much they charge for services rendered.” The insurer encourages sufferers to verify that every one medical care they search comes from medical suppliers within the Blue Cross community, he added.
Prices for urine checks can differ broadly relying upon complexity and the expertise used. Some docs’ places of work use a easy cup check, which may detect a number of courses of medication on the spot. These checks not often value greater than $200, and usually a lot much less.
Email Sign-Up
Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.
Bills climb larger when labs examine for ranges of a number of medicine and invoice for every one, a follow insurers argue is seldom medically justified. But even labs sued by insurers alleging wildly extreme testing usually have billed $9,000 or much less, court docket data present. One insurer sued a lab for charging $1,845 for a drug check, for example.
Davis stated Sunset Labs ignored his requests for a full clarification of the fees. In May, he filed a written grievance in regards to the invoice with the Texas legal professional basic’s workplace that included a replica of the invoice and accused the lab of “price gouging of staggering proportions.”
“Young people just starting out, such as my daughter, may not have the ability to pay and this could result in damaged credit ratings or even bankruptcy,” he wrote.
Davis acquired a letter again from Attorney General Ken Paxton, who stated the workplace would “review the information.” A spokesperson for Paxton advised KHN: “We have received complaints about that business, but we can’t comment on anything else.” Sunset legal professional Mendez stated the lab is “not aware” of any such complaints.
In an interview, Davis additionally questioned the necessity for his daughter’s urine check as a result of she acquired opioids just for a brief interval and the outcomes would have had no affect on her therapy. In his grievance to the legal professional basic, Davis stated the surgeon advised him he ordered the checks as a result of he feared attainable retribution from the state medical licensing board for not testing sufferers who had been prescribed an opioid. The Texas Medical Board doesn’t require urine checks for sufferers receiving opioids for short-term ache, stated spokesman Jarrett Schneider. That’s a “question of independent medical judgment as to whether the physician believes a drug test should be required,” he stated.
Bad Reviews
Sunset Labs has an “F” ranking with the Houston Better Business Bureau, which on its website posts an August 2017 grievance from a affected person charged $16,150 for a urine check.
“This is not covered under my health insurance so I am expected to pay this excessive bill,” the grievance reads.
A second website that publishes authorities billing numbers of docs and medical companies features a remark part with greater than a dozen unfavorable “reviews,” largely complaints that the lab slammed sufferers with hundreds of in charges their insurers balked at paying.
In a pair of lawsuits filed in 2015, three docs looking for to stop working at ache clinics operated by Phan accused the services of improper billing practices, together with pointless urine testing. The docs stated they feared dropping their medical licenses until they severed their ties.
In one go well with, Drs. Purvi Patel and Lance LaFleur additionally alleged that the ache clinics “pressured” docs to overprescribe medical gear and genetic checks to insured sufferers “regardless of medical necessity.” The case didn’t go ahead as a result of the docs didn’t pursue it. Neither physician would remark.
In the second authorized case, ache specialist Dr. Baominh Vinh stated he resigned in April 2015 “based on certain questionable business practices … that are inconsistent with my ethical boundaries.” Vinh additionally alleged urine testing was overused. In a countersuit towards Vinh, the ache clinics known as his allegations a “falsehood” to justify violation of his employment contract.
The events settled in March of final yr. Terms are confidential, however a lawyer for the ache clinics stated Vinh paid cash to the corporate “and not vice versa.”
KHN’s protection associated to getting older and bettering care of older adults is supported partially by The John A. Hartford Foundation.
Fred Schulte: [email protected]”>[email protected], @fredschulte
Related Topics Cost and Quality Health Industry Insurance Bill Of The Month Investigation Out-Of-Pocket Costs src=”http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=”utf-Eight”>
