Rae Ellen Bichell
Lawmakers in a number of states are working to broaden medical debt protections for sufferers, even after the Trump administration reversed course and informed states they don’t have authority to take motion on credit score reporting.
In Alaska and Michigan, legislators are nonetheless advancing payments to maintain medical debt off client credit score experiences.
The attorneys common of California and Colorado mentioned they might stand behind credit score reporting legal guidelines enacted in these states lately, at the same time as Colorado faces a lawsuit from debt collectors contesting such legal guidelines.
Indiana and Ohio lawmakers have dropped proposals to take away medical debt from credit score experiences however are pushing laws that will lengthen different protections to sufferers who can’t pay their medical payments.
“Seventy-four percent of Alaska voters don’t think credit reports should include medical debt,” mentioned state Rep. Genevieve Mina, a Democrat sponsoring a medical debt measure there. “I’m not going to wait on the courts on the medical debt issue.”
An estimated 100 million Americans are saddled with health care debt. And a rising variety of pink and blue states have enacted legal guidelines to guard sufferers.
But federal coverage on such debt boomeranged this 12 months when President Donald Trump’s administration selected to not defend federal regulations that will have eliminated medical debt from all Americans’ credit score scores. And in October, Trump’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau said that states do not need the authority to manage client credit score experiences.
“It’s sort of a head-spinning, 180-degree reversal,” mentioned Chi Chi Wu, an lawyer with the National Consumer Law Center, which advocates for folks with low incomes. She referred to as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, now led by Project 2025 architect Russell Vought, the “evil twin” of its predecessor underneath President Joe Biden.
The bureau didn’t reply to requests for remark.
Eight days after the brand new federal steerage, debt collectors filed a lawsuit contesting Colorado’s 2023 medical debt credit score reporting regulation, the primary to require elimination of some or all medical debt from credit score experiences.
Scott Purcell, CEO of ACA International, which is a debt assortment commerce group and a plaintiff within the Colorado go well with, mentioned eradicating the debt makes it tougher to gauge creditworthiness, which he mentioned would lead collectors to imagine everyone seems to be a riskier guess.
His organization’s case additionally argues the Colorado regulation violates the First Amendment by suppressing “truthful commercial speech.”
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat, referred to as the lawsuit outrageous in a press release to KFF Health News. His workplace, he mentioned, “will strongly oppose all efforts to strip away critical medical debt protections.”
In California, Attorney General Rob Bonta, too, is standing agency on his state’s regulation no matter how federal officers now interpret state rights. The Democrat informed constituents in a Nov. 13 alert: “Let me be clear: This remains the law in California.”
In different states nonetheless considering credit score reporting legal guidelines, legislators are adjusting their technique to account for the lawsuit and the Trump administration’s strikes, by both ditching the plan to take away medical debt from credit score experiences or modifying such laws.
Wu mentioned her group noticed the federal change coming and had already urged state lawmakers to make pending laws on credit score reporting extra lawsuit-proof by trying upstream and downstream of the credit score reporting companies. For instance, Wu mentioned, states can inform landlords, employers, or different credit score report perusers that they can not use an individual’s medical debt historical past of their decision-making. And states can require well being suppliers to incorporate, of their contracts with debt collectors, limits on what they’ll inform credit score reporting companies concerning the payments they’re amassing.
“You’ll often hear providers say, ‘Oh, well, we don’t want to hurt our patients’ credit,’” she mentioned. “Tell the debt collectors, ‘Don’t report this.’”
Alaska’s laws has each parts: It bars landlords from making choices about potential renters primarily based on their medical debt historical past, and it bars suppliers and collectors from telling credit score reporting companies about affected person debt.
Elsewhere, state lawmakers have opted out of attempting to move credit score reporting provisions in proposed laws. Indiana state Sen. Fady Qaddoura, a Democrat, filed a medical debt measure that tries to, amongst different issues, cap rates of interest, restrict wage garnishment, and preserve folks from shedding their houses over unpaid payments from medically vital procedures. But he and his colleagues made a tactical choice to depart out credit score reporting, after unsuccessfully together with it in the same invoice final 12 months.
“It’s out of legislative pragmatism,” Qaddoura mentioned. “We want to be sure that you don’t get a piece of legislation killed with many benefits to tens of thousands of families just because one provision can’t go in.”
In Ohio, Democratic state Rep. Michele Grim made the same calculation. She has been engaged on a measure to ban wage garnishment over medical debt, cap rates of interest for such debt at 3%, and scratch it from credit score experiences. She mentioned she and different lawmakers not too long ago eliminated the credit score reporting portion.
“It’s better to pass something than nothing at all,” Grim mentioned. “It still bans wage garnishment, which is a very aggressive, more-common-than-you-think practice. And it caps the interest rate.”
A latest investigation by KFF Health News discovered that, in Colorado alone, hundreds of individuals every year have their wages garnished to pay again medical payments, and a few folks taken to courtroom for medical money owed by no means truly owed the cash.
Legislative efforts to guard folks from the consequences of medical debt are sometimes bipartisan, however that doesn’t imply they move simply. Even earlier than the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau reversed its stance on credit score experiences, a number of measures hit obstacles in conservative states this 12 months, and laws failed in Wyoming and South Dakota that aimed to take medical debt off credit score experiences.
Americans are largely protected against having their credit score scores dinged by small medical money owed. In 2023, the three massive credit score bureaus — TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian — voluntarily opted to take away medical money owed underneath $500 from their credit score experiences, and the Consumer Data Industry Association, a commerce group for the businesses, confirmed they’re nonetheless doing so.
Even so, lawmakers in a number of states mentioned they’re deciding whether or not and learn how to get forward of the federal steerage with laws that tackles further, bigger medical debt on credit score experiences.
“We know that this will need to get beefed up,” mentioned Sarah Anthony, a Democratic state senator in Michigan, of legislation she’s co-sponsoring. She isn’t certain what that may seem like, although client advocates together with Libby Benton hope to see the measure comply with Wu’s technique.
“These aren’t debts that people choose to take on. People might choose to buy a huge pickup truck and that’s a bad financial decision,” mentioned Benton, director of the Michigan Poverty Law Program. “People don’t choose to have emergency heart bypass surgery.”
Yet each can find yourself on a credit score report.
KFF Health News is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is likely one of the core working applications at KFF—an unbiased supply of well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism. Learn extra about KFF.
USE OUR CONTENT
This story could be republished totally free (details).