David Hilzenrath and Jodie Fleischer, Cox Media Group
The Social Security Administration is backing off a plan it introduced in March to withhold 100% of many beneficiaries’ month-to-month funds to claw again cash the federal government had allegedly overpaid them.
Instead, the company will default to withholding 50% of old-age, survivors, and incapacity insurance coverage advantages, the company mentioned in an “emergency message” to employees dated April 25.
The company lengthy made it a routine to halt advantages to recoup billions of {dollars} it despatched recipients however later mentioned they need to not have obtained. A coverage beneath the Joe Biden administration to offer reduction to beneficiaries, who typically dwell on the perimeter of poverty, final yr had capped the clawbacks at 10%.
The partial reversal is one other twist within the Trump administration’s tumultuous method to Social Security, which has included staff cuts and the appearing commissioner’s menace, which has since been withdrawn, to primarily shut down the agency.
The emergency message entails the company’s follow of paying beneficiaries cash they weren’t alleged to obtain — after which, typically after years have handed and the quantities have ballooned to tens of 1000’s of {dollars} or extra per individual — demanding the cash again, even when the overpayment was Social Security’s fault.
In many instances, recovering the cash had entailed withholding 100% of month-to-month advantages.
Millions of beneficiaries, together with individuals struggling to get by on month-to-month checks, have obtained overpayment notices, a 2023 investigation by KFF Health News and Cox Media Group discovered. Clawbacks have left some homeless, the information organizations reported.
In the aftermath of that reporting, Martin O’Malley, tapped by President Joe Biden in 2023 to go the company, sought to finish what he described as “grave injustices” that left individuals “in dire financial straits.”
In March 2024, O’Malley mentioned the company would cease “that clawback cruelty” of intercepting 100% of a beneficiary’s month-to-month verify in the event that they fail to reply to a requirement for reimbursement. Instead, the company would default to withholding 10% of the recipient’s month-to-month advantages, he mentioned.
A yr later, the Trump administration reversed that policy change, returning to 100% withholding for brand spanking new overpayments. “It is our duty to revise the overpayment repayment policy back to full withholding, as it was during the Obama administration and first Trump administration, to properly safeguard taxpayer funds,” appearing Commissioner Lee Dudek mentioned in a March news release.
Now, in a sample that has performed out on a number of fronts in the course of the first 100 days of President Donald Trump’s second time period, the administration is partly reversing the reversal.
This time, it issued no information launch.
“I think that we had the policy right before,” O’Malley mentioned in an interview April 28. “We looked at the various break points, and if you would depend entirely on your Social Security check, having half of it interrupted means what? That means you go without paying your heating bill for the month; that means you’d go without your medicine instead of buying medicine and food.”
“So it was a cruelhearted policy before,” he added. At 50%, “it’s half as cruel, but it’s still cruel.”
Withholding even 50% of month-to-month advantages will “cause hardship for many older and disabled people,” mentioned Kathleen Romig, who labored on the Social Security Administration beneath O’Malley and is now director of Social Security and incapacity coverage on the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. “Going without half a Social Security check would make it harder for many people to afford basic needs like housing, food, and health care,” Romig mentioned.
The SSA press workplace didn’t reply to questions for this text.
The emergency message to SSA employees mentioned the brand new coverage applies to overpayment notices despatched on or after April 25. In one place, the message mentioned the brand new withholding fee can be “up to 50 percent.” If the recipient doesn’t request a decrease fee of withholding, reconsideration, or a waiver — and “if there is no fraud or similar fault” — the company will start chopping their profit fee after about 90 days, it mentioned.
That doesn’t apply to withholding of advantages within the Supplemental Security Income program, which serves individuals who have disabilities and older adults who’ve little or no earnings or sources, because the SSA explains. The company mentioned in March that withholding of SSI advantages would stay capped at 10%.
Kate Lang, director of federal earnings safety on the advocacy group Justice in Aging, welcomed the shift from 100% withholding however mentioned she was dissatisfied the company didn’t revert to 10%. Lang known as the company’s conduct “chaotic and confusing.”
“It creates more work for SSA — more people calling with questions, more errors being made that need to be corrected, more confusion and uncertainty about what is going on,” Lang mentioned.
“It’s a nightmare,” O’Malley mentioned, “for not only the staff to have all of the switcheroo on policy, but also for the beneficiaries.”
Do you’ve gotten an expertise with Social Security overpayments you’d wish to share? Click here to contact our reporting staff.
KFF Health News is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is likely one of the core working applications at KFF—an impartial supply of well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism. Learn extra about KFF.
USE OUR CONTENT
This story may be republished without spending a dime (details).