[khn_slabs slabs=”1010178″ view=”inline” /]
[partner-box] Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., sparred with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) at the newest Democratic presidential major debate over easy methods to develop medical health insurance protection for all Americans.
Buttigieg stated he favors permitting Americans youthful than 65 to enroll in Medicare if they need. Warren, in contrast, prefers to transition all Americans from their present insurance coverage plan to authorities protection.
“Elizabeth supports ‘Medicare for All,’ which would provide all Americans with a public health care program,” her website says.
Here’s what Buttigieg stated on the Oct. 15 debate in Westerville, Ohio:
“I don’t think the American people are wrong when they say that what they want is a choice. The choice of Medicare for All who want it, which is affordable for everyone, because we make sure that the subsidies are in place, allows you to get that health care. It’s just better than Medicare for All whether you want it or not. And I don’t understand why you believe the only way to deliver affordable coverage to everybody is to obliterate private plans.”
[khn_slabs slabs=”1009694″ view=”pull-right” /]
Is Buttigieg appropriate to say that Americans choose giving individuals underneath 65 an choice to hitch Medicare versus requiring them to surrender their present protection?
As we search to reply this query, we’ll start by noting that terminology and query wording issues rather a lot when pollsters ask Americans for his or her preferences.
Looking on the recent polls on well being coverage reveals a large variation in how questions are worded, making a lot of them not helpful for refereeing the Buttigieg-Warren trade.
However, we did discover two polls from 2019 which are on level — and each of them assist Buttigieg’s place.
An NPR/PBS News Hour/Marist poll carried out in mid July requested, “Do you think Medicare for all, that is a national health insurance program for all Americans that replaces private health insurance, is a good idea or a bad idea?” This is actually the Warren strategy.
[khn_slabs slabs=”790331″ view=”inline” /]
On that query, 41% of respondents thought that was a good suggestion, however a bigger proportion — 54% — stated it was a foul thought.
A second query by NPR/PBS/Marist requested respondents about an strategy extra consistent with Buttigieg’s thought.
The survey requested, “Do you think Medicare for all that want it, that is, allow all Americans to choose between a national health insurance program or their own private health insurance, is a good idea or a bad idea?”
That proposal earned a robust thumbs-up from respondents: 70% stated it was a good suggestion, with solely 25% saying it was a foul thought.
A second ballot — conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation in January 2019 — discovered stronger assist for the Buttigieg strategy than for the Warren strategy. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially unbiased program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.)
The survey requested, “Do you favor or oppose having a national health plan, sometimes called Medicare-for-all, in which all Americans would get their insurance from a single government plan?” — basically the Warren strategy.
For this query, a majority did favor it — 56% assist in comparison with 42% opposition.
[khn_slabs slabs=”1010183″ view=”pull-right” /]
But assist was even stronger for the Buttigieg strategy. The survey requested, “Do you favor or oppose creating a national government administered health plan similar to Medicare that would be open to anyone, but would allow people to keep the coverage they have if they prefer?”
This drew assist from 74% of respondents and opposition from solely 24%.
A 3rd choice with a barely completely different wording fared even higher in KFF’s polling. “Do you favor or oppose allowing people between the ages of 50 and 64 to buy insurance through the Medicare program?”
This gained the assist of 77% of respondents, in comparison with solely 18% opposition. Support was sturdy throughout all events: It gained 85% assist from Democrats, 75% assist from Independents, and 69% from Republicans.
The basis’s most up-to-date polling, released the same day as the debate, reveals a gentle rise in assist for the Buttigieg strategy — from 65% in July to 73% in October — and a gentle decline for Warren’s strategy — from 56% in January to 51% in October.
Our Ruling
Buttigieg stated that Americans “say that what they want is a choice” to hitch a single-payer system like Medicare relatively than ending non-public insurance coverage.
Polling on this query reveals larger ranges of assist for an opt-in strategy to increasing Medicare than for a required change away from non-public insurance coverage. We charge the assertion True.
This story will be republished totally free (details). Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., sparred with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) at the newest Democratic presidential major debate over easy methods to develop medical health insurance protection for all Americans.
Buttigieg stated he favors permitting Americans youthful than 65 to enroll in Medicare if they need. Warren, in contrast, prefers to transition all Americans from their present insurance coverage plan to authorities protection.
“Elizabeth supports ‘Medicare for All,’ which would provide all Americans with a public health care program,” her website says.
Here’s what Buttigieg stated on the Oct. 15 debate in Westerville, Ohio:
“I don’t think the American people are wrong when they say that what they want is a choice. The choice of Medicare for All who want it, which is affordable for everyone, because we make sure that the subsidies are in place, allows you to get that health care. It’s just better than Medicare for All whether you want it or not. And I don’t understand why you believe the only way to deliver affordable coverage to everybody is to obliterate private plans.”
Is Buttigieg appropriate to say that Americans choose giving individuals underneath 65 an choice to hitch Medicare versus requiring them to surrender their present protection?
As we search to reply this query, we’ll start by noting that terminology and query wording issues rather a lot when pollsters ask Americans for his or her preferences.
Looking on the recent polls on well being coverage reveals a large variation in how questions are worded, making a lot of them not helpful for refereeing the Buttigieg-Warren trade.
However, we did discover two polls from 2019 which are on level — and each of them assist Buttigieg’s place.
An NPR/PBS News Hour/Marist poll carried out in mid July requested, “Do you think Medicare for all, that is a national health insurance program for all Americans that replaces private health insurance, is a good idea or a bad idea?” This is actually the Warren strategy.
On that query, 41% of respondents thought that was a good suggestion, however a bigger proportion — 54% — stated it was a foul thought.
A second query by NPR/PBS/Marist requested respondents about an strategy extra consistent with Buttigieg’s thought.
The survey requested, “Do you think Medicare for all that want it, that is, allow all Americans to choose between a national health insurance program or their own private health insurance, is a good idea or a bad idea?”
That proposal earned a robust thumbs-up from respondents: 70% stated it was a good suggestion, with solely 25% saying it was a foul thought.
A second ballot — conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation in January 2019 — discovered stronger assist for the Buttigieg strategy than for the Warren strategy. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially unbiased program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.)
The survey requested, “Do you favor or oppose having a national health plan, sometimes called Medicare-for-all, in which all Americans would get their insurance from a single government plan?” — basically the Warren strategy.
For this query, a majority did favor it — 56% assist in comparison with 42% opposition.
But assist was even stronger for the Buttigieg strategy. The survey requested, “Do you favor or oppose creating a national government administered health plan similar to Medicare that would be open to anyone, but would allow people to keep the coverage they have if they prefer?”
This drew assist from 74% of respondents and opposition from solely 24%.
A 3rd choice with a barely completely different wording fared even higher in KFF’s polling. “Do you favor or oppose allowing people between the ages of 50 and 64 to buy insurance through the Medicare program?”
This gained the assist of 77% of respondents, in comparison with solely 18% opposition. Support was sturdy throughout all events: It gained 85% assist from Democrats, 75% assist from Independents, and 69% from Republicans.
The basis’s most up-to-date polling, released the same day as the debate, reveals a gentle rise in assist for the Buttigieg strategy — from 65% in July to 73% in October — and a gentle decline for Warren’s strategy — from 56% in January to 51% in October.
Our Ruling
Buttigieg stated that Americans “say that what they want is a choice” to hitch a single-payer system like Medicare relatively than ending non-public insurance coverage.
Polling on this query reveals larger ranges of assist for an opt-in strategy to increasing Medicare than for a required change away from non-public insurance coverage. We charge the assertion True.
