Jordan Rau, Kaiser Health News
Sarah Witter needed to pay for a second surgical procedure to restore her damaged leg after a metallic plate put in in the course of the first surgical procedure broke. On Friday, she acquired a extra welcome break — a $6,358.26 refund from the hospital and her insurer.
Witter’s expertise was the topic of December’s KHN-NPR “Bill of the Month” feature. She and her insurer, Aetna, had racked up $99,159 in payments from a Rutland, Vt., hospital and numerous medical suppliers after she fractured her leg in a snowboarding accident final February.
A surgeon at Rutland Regional Medical Center implanted two metallic plates, hooked up to her leg bones to assist them heal. Less than 4 months later, considered one of these plates broke, requiring her to have a second surgical procedure to switch the plate. Witter, who’s 63, ended up paying $18,442, largely to the hospital, for her portion of the whole value for all her care from the hospital, medical doctors, emergency providers and bodily therapists.
After KHN contacted Aetna about these prices, the insurer observed that Rutland Regional had billed Witter for the distinction between what it charged for its providers and what Aetna thought-about an applicable worth for the primary surgical procedure. Those extra fees are generally known as “balance bills” and happen when a medical supplier will not be within the insurer’s community and has no contract with the insurer. Rutland Regional will not be in Aetna’s community. In our unique story, KHN had calculated $7,410 in steadiness payments.
Aetna stated it contacted the hospital and negotiated a compromise by which the insurer paid the hospital practically $three,800 and the hospital waived the rest of the fees to Witter that Aetna thought-about unreasonably excessive.
“As part of her benefits plan, Sarah’s claims in question went through a patient advocacy process that allows us to negotiate with the provider on the member’s behalf to resolve any balance billing issues,” a spokesman wrote.
Aetna stated it’ll negotiate disputed payments for any of its clients who request help, and likewise assist schedule appointments, get providers approved and cope with different non-medical issues. However, an Aetna spokesman wrote, “we weren’t fully aware of all of the bills that Sarah had received before we received them from you/her.”
On Friday, Rutland Regional once more declined to debate Witter’s account. Witter stated she discovered of the refund throughout a gathering, at Rutland Regional’s invitation, with a hospital monetary administrator.
“They went through all the costs and I guess treated it [the first surgery] more like it was a hospital service that was within my contract,” she stated. The administrator informed her they’d “reprocessed” the fees from her second surgical procedure, however that her portion of the invoice didn’t change, she stated.
“It’s good news — who doesn’t like getting money back? But I don’t quite understand,” she stated. “If it’s that easy for them to reprocess this billing to get me this, then it’s obvious that everything is really arbitrary.”
One distinction between the 2 surgical procedures was the primary one was performed throughout a disaster after Witter was admitted to the hospital via the emergency room. Balance payments in these circumstances are essentially the most troublesome to justify as a result of sufferers with accidents that require rapid care, equivalent to a coronary heart assault or automobile accident, are normally taken to the closest medical facility. Patients usually are not able to determine the place the closest in-network various is.
Neither Witter’s hospital nor her insurer budged on her underlying grievance: that she shouldn’t have needed to pay for second surgical procedure, which value $43,208, as a result of one of many plates — generally known as a bone fixation gadget and manufactured by Johnson & Johnson’s DePuy Synthes — broke.
Device producers typically don’t provide warranties for hardware units as soon as they’ve been implanted, saying that gadget failure may be because of quite a lot of components past the corporate’s management. Those embody poor implantation by the surgeon; bones that fail to heal and topic the gadget to unremitting pressure, inflicting metallic fatigue; or sufferers who apply an excessive amount of weight or motion on the bone regardless of directions to not.
DePuy, which declined to remark for this story, earlier stated that gadget failures happen in “rare circumstances.” In its directions for surgeons, DePuy famous: “It is important to note that these implants may break at any time if they are subjected to sufficient stresses.”
Witter stated her surgeon was current at her assembly at Rutland Regional and informed her that “the fact the bone hadn’t completely healed yet was part of the problem.” She stated she has not been capable of finding a contact for the gadget producer so she will be able to complain about it breaking.
Even after she receives her refund subsequent week, Witter nonetheless could have paid $12,084 for her damaged limb. Asked her recommendation for different sufferers coping with payments they contemplate extreme, she stated: “Don’t break your leg.”
Do you have got an fascinating or outrageous medical invoice you’d like KHN and NPR to look at? Tell us about it!
Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a nationwide well being coverage information service. It is an editorially impartial program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation which isn’t affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.
