Supreme Court Declines To Hear Military Medical Malpractice Case

Use Our Content This story could be republished totally free (details).

The household of a younger Navy nurse who died after army medical doctors allegedly didn’t halt huge bleeding following childbirth gained’t get a listening to within the nation’s highest courtroom.

The Supreme Court on Monday denied a petition that sought to alter what’s referred to as the Feres doctrine, a long-standing rule that bars active-duty army members from suing the federal authorities for accidents, together with medical malpractice.

The justices declined to debate the case of Navy Lt. Rebekah “Moani” Daniel, who was 33 in 2014 when she died following a large postpartum hemorrhage on the Naval Hospital Bremerton, inside hours of the beginning of her daughter, Victoria.

In court documents, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated she would have granted the petition. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the choice, arguing that it was as much as the courtroom to rethink the rule within the absence of a choice by Congress. He famous that the courtroom in current rulings “twisted traditional tort principles” to permit sure veterans to hunt damages for negligence.

“Such unfortunate repercussions — denial of relief to military personnel and distortions of other areas of law to compensate — will continue to ripple through our jurisprudence as long as the Court refuses to reconsider Feres,” he wrote.

Email Sign-Up

Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.

Through a lawyer, the nurse’s widower, Walter Daniel, and her daughter, Victoria, now Four, argued that the courtroom ought to amend the 1950 ruling to permit service members to sue for medical malpractice the identical means civilians can.

“Sadly, the justice system remains closed to our family, our colleagues and the families who commit their lives to military service,” Daniel, 39, stated in a press release Monday. “Victoria and I won’t have the opportunity to learn what led to Moani’s death, and to ensure others don’t experience the same tragedy.”

Andrew Hoyal, Daniel’s lawyer, stated he was “clearly disappointed” on the determination however heartened on the responses from Thomas and Ginsburg.

“We knew from the beginning that this would be a long journey with even longer odds,” he stated.

Rebekah Daniel died on March 9, 2014, on the Washington state facility. In a 2015 wrongful dying lawsuit, her husband claimed that she died from botched medical care that didn’t halt hemorrhaging of practically a 3rd of the blood in her physique.

Daniel, a former Coast Guard officer, disputed the findings of a Navy post-mortem that concluded Rebekah Daniel died of “natural” causes probably linked to a uncommon, hard-to-prove complication of childbirth.

But that lawsuit and subsequent appeals have been dismissed not primarily based on the info of the case however due to the Feres doctrine, which holds that active-duty members of the army can’t sue below the Federal Tort Claims Act for hurt that they incur “incident to service.”

The ruling was final challenged within the excessive courtroom greater than 30 years in the past when the justices voted 5-Four to uphold it. That determination drew a scathing dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia, who declared the rule needs to be scrapped. More just lately, Justice Thomas additionally argued it needs to be amended.

Since then, nevertheless, the courtroom has refused to just accept two earlier petitions that might have allowed reconsideration. The Daniel request beat the percentages. Of the 7,000 to eight,000 instances submitted to the Supreme Court every time period, solely about 80 are accepted.

Congress has thought-about amending the Feres rule previously however stopped wanting motion. In April, Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) launched H.R. 2422, which might enable active-duty service members to sue the federal government for damages attributable to medical malpractice. The invoice has been referred to the House judiciary committee.

Daniel stated he would proceed to work with lawmakers and advocates to alter the rule.

“Our case and our combat is over — however it continues for different service members. Moani’s story has generated a groundswell of momentum to appropriate the injustice of Feres, and now this situation goes all the way in which to Capitol Hill,” the assertion stated.

Use Our Content This story could be republished totally free (details).

JoNel Aleccia:”>, @JoNel_Aleccia

Related Topics Courts src=”” charset=”utf-Eight”>

Most Popular features the latest multimedia technologies, from live video streaming to audio packages to searchable archives of news features and background information. The site is updated continuously throughout the day.

Copyright © 2017 Breaking Express, Green Media Corporation

To Top