In the primary three months after getting his Dexcom steady glucose monitor, Ric Peralta mentioned, he diminished his common blood sugar stage by three proportion factors.
“It took me from not-very-well-managed blood sugar to something that was incredibly well managed,” mentioned Peralta, a 46-year-old optician in Whittier, Calif., who was recognized with Type 1 diabetes in 2008.
Peralta was so enthused that he grew to become a “Dexcom Warrior,” a type of grassroots spokesman for the product. It grew to become laborious to think about life with out his new monitor, a tool that lets him monitor the traits in his blood sugar 24 hours a day on his smartphone. And but, he has spent weeks at a time with out the gadget over the previous yr due to insurance coverage restrictions. Physician teams and sufferers take into account these guidelines burdensome, however insurers defend them as obligatory.
Diabetes activists and legislators have began to focus consideration on the surging price of insulin, resulting in legislative pushes, lawsuits and congressional hearings. But insulin isn’t the one factor folks with Type 1 diabetes are struggling to get. Managing the situation requires different important, typically lifesaving medical provides. And sufferers continuously face hurdles in gaining access to these provides — hurdles put in place by insurance coverage corporations.
A Life-Changing Device
Peralta discovered concerning the newest model of the Dexcom steady glucose monitor from the mom of considered one of his sufferers. He visited the corporate’s web site and, inside two weeks, the gadget was shipped to his entrance door.
“I still didn’t 100% appreciate exactly how it was going to change my life,” Peralta mentioned. “It was amazing.”
Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.
Typically, folks with Type 1 diabetes examine their blood sugar by drawing a drop of blood from a finger and putting it on a disposable take a look at strip that’s learn by a blood glucose meter. Doctors counsel checking blood sugar this fashion between 4 and 10 instances a day. These readings are essential for serving to folks with diabetes handle their blood sugar — preserving it from getting too low, which may result in sudden seizures and lack of consciousness, in addition to from getting too excessive, which may trigger imaginative and prescient loss and nerve harm and might even, over time, result in amputations.
Instead, Peralta’s steady glucose monitor gave correct blood sugar readings each 5 minutes. That’s 288 readings a day, or about 278 extra readings than even essentially the most conscientious sufferers get the old school manner.
“When I had to do the old-fashioned finger prick test, I was only doing that right before I ate, so I could see how much [insulin] I was supposed to take,” Peralta mentioned. (People with Type 1 diabetes must take a number of each day photographs of insulin to maintain their blood sugar throughout the regular vary as a result of their our bodies cease producing the naturally occurring hormone.)
“I didn’t realize that I had rather severe [blood sugar] peaks and valleys in between my mealtimes,” Peralta mentioned.
Tighter management of blood sugar can reduce the risk of coronary heart illness, kidney failure and nerve harm. For Peralta, it additionally provided peace of thoughts.
The monitor sounds an alarm when his blood sugar will get dangerously low; Peralta mentioned his co-workers have began bringing him sugary snacks after they hear the alarm, to assist him elevate his blood sugar again to regular. When he takes his household on highway journeys — a favourite exercise — he now not has to fret about the potential of passing out whereas driving.
“It even syncs with my car so I can just say, ‘Siri, what’s my blood sugar?’ And it will come over the car stereo system,” Peralta mentioned. “I’m safe for my family.”
When widespread power circumstances corresponding to diabetes are properly managed, it prevents worsening illness and saves cash for the well being system and the affected person.
But Peralta mentioned his efforts to make use of this new software persistently to handle his diabetes have been stymied by insurance coverage issues that started a couple of yr in the past.
The latest Dexcom steady glucose monitor has three elements: a sensor that measures glucose ranges, a transmitter that sends out the sensor’s readings wirelessly and a receiver that shows these readings on a display screen.
For every of those elements, Peralta wants “prior authorization” — a requirement that his doctor get approval from his insurance coverage firm earlier than prescribing the gadget.
The Dexcom sensors final about 10 days every, and Peralta’s insurance coverage permits him to purchase a three-month provide at a time. But he additionally has to get prior authorization for every provide, that means each three months his physician must reconfirm together with his insurance coverage firm that the sensors are medically obligatory. Same goes for the gadget’s transmitters — which final about six months every.
“I have to jump through hoops and they have to jump through hoops to get information from my insurance to get authorization,” Peralta mentioned in frustration, including that “for the last year, basically every time there’s been something that’s gone wrong.”
“Prior authorizations are in place to protect patients, to improve safety and to try to make sure that the care they receive is as safe as possible and also as affordable as possible,” mentioned Kate Berry of the commerce group America’s Health Insurance Programs.
But to Ric Peralta, the requirement is a burden.
The most up-to-date snafu occurred in March. Peralta ordered a brand new provide of sensors immediately from Dexcom however mentioned the corporate submitted a request for approval of a brand new transmitter as properly. And as a result of his insurance coverage approves the sensors and transmitters on completely different authorization timelines, the entire declare was denied. Peralta estimates he spent 4 hours on the telephone with Dexcom and his insurer over the subsequent month and a half to type all of it out. During that point he needed to revert to finger-stick assessments.
“It’s maddening,” Peralta mentioned. “If I do not have my proper management of this disease, I’m going to die from it. And they’re making it as difficult as possible.”
A Burden On Doctors, Too
Prior authorizations have change into a significant concern of physicians throughout the U.S. well being care system, as evidenced by a December survey by the American Medical Association.
Of the 1,000 physicians surveyed, 91% mentioned prior authorizations “have a negative impact on patient clinical outcomes”; 75% mentioned the necessities “can at least sometimes lead to patients abandoning a recommended course of treatment”; and 28% mentioned the prior-authorization course of had “led to serious or life-threatening events” for his or her sufferers.
“In my practice, we have five individual physicians, and we hired five full-time employees whose primary duty is obtaining prior authorization and dealing with insurance companies,” mentioned Dr. Bruce Scott, an otolaryngologist from Kentucky and speaker of the AMA House of Delegates.
“Prior authorization is a burden on providers and diverts valuable resources,” Scott mentioned. “That’s a problem.”
The AMA has even created a website that catalogs tales of sufferers and suppliers who say they’ve struggled to achieve entry to necessary medical merchandise and procedures due to issues with getting prior authorization from insurers — all the pieces from ache medicine for a most cancers affected person to X-rays within the ER. Scott mentioned the AMA doesn’t count on insurers to fully dispose of necessities for prior authorization, “but we believe that it should be focused and that it should be better planned.”
The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists — a company of the physicians whose specialty is commonly related to diabetes remedy — goes additional.
“We feel that physicians that are specialists in endocrine disease should not be required to fill out prior authorizations for endocrine treatments,” mentioned Dr. Scott Isaacs, an endocrinologist from Atlanta and a member of the board of administrators of AACE.
“It’s a huge burden for the patients trying to get this sorted out. Sometimes it’s red tape; sometimes it’s a true denial,” Isaacs mentioned. “It’s a huge burden for the doctors as well, and the doctors resent it.”
Berry, of America’s Health Insurance Programs, acknowledges there’s room for enchancment within the prior-authorization course of. In reality, in January 2018, the AMA and AHIP signed a consensus statement figuring out 5 areas for enchancment. It was co-signed by the American Hospital Association, the American Pharmacists Association, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and the Medical Group Management Association.
Who Bears The Greatest Burden?
For Ric Peralta, the final word burden of getting all these prescriptions stuffed falls on him and different sufferers like him.
After his newest mix-up with the sensors in March, he found the battery in his transmitter had died.
Peralta made one other annoyed name to Dexcom, and not too long ago acquired a complimentary transmitter to get him again on the system whereas his formal order goes by way of the approval course of.
“I’m quite nervous about what’s going to happen again in two months when I am needing to call in orders again,” Peralta mentioned.
“Am I going to have to go through this whole thing over again?”
This story is a part of NPR’s reporting partnership with Kaiser Health News.
Bram Sable-Smith: @besables