This story was produced in partnership with PolitiFact.
This story will be republished totally free (details).
As Americans proceed to grapple with the novel coronavirus, one query is on lots of people’s minds: Are we already seeing, or will we finally see, a second wave of the virus?
On June 16, Vice President Mike Pence penned an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal headlined, “There Isn’t a Coronavirus ‘Second Wave,’” the place he mentioned the nation was higher off than media experiences instructed.
Yet the identical day, in an interview with the identical newspaper, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the highest federal infectious illness professional, threw chilly water on Pence’s assertion by warning of a attainable resurgence. “People keep talking about a second wave,” he mentioned. “We’re still in a first wave.”
Subscribe to KHN’s free Morning Briefing.
Defining a coronavirus “wave” is considerably extra artwork than science, however different scientists wanting on the variety of new day by day infections echo Fauci’s warning.
The variety of new day by day infections (as seen on this chart) declined by solely about one-third between its peak in early March and its most up-to-date low level in early June. And since early June, the information exhibits an upward spike, approaching the place it stood at that peak.
We checked with specialists to higher perceive what wave we’re presently in, what the outlook is for a attainable new wave, and what, if something, we are able to study from the historical past of the 1918 influenza pandemic, which was the final main pandemic within the United States. Here’s what we discovered.
Are We Out Of The First Wave Yet?
There’s no official definition of when a “wave” begins or ends however, usually talking, it requires a peak in infections adopted by a considerable discount. A brand new rise and peak would sign the beginning of one other wave.
“It is probably not realistic for the number of new cases to drop to zero, but ideally one would like to see sustained decreases in the number of new cases over time or stability in the number of new cases over time,” mentioned Nicole Gatto, an affiliate professor within the School of Community and Global Health at Claremont Graduate University in California.
The chart above, displaying the nationwide image, suggests there was an easing within the variety of new circumstances, however not a big drop previous to the present spike, scientists say.
And sure states haven’t come near ending their first wave.
“Some places, such as New York and Boston, have what appears to be a clear first peak or wave,” mentioned Brooke Nichols, an assistant professor at Boston University’s School of Public Health. “Some places are still in the first wave.”
The following chart exhibits states which have skilled a primary wave and considerably introduced down their new infections.
Meanwhile, different states haven’t but turned the nook on the primary wave:
If you’re in a state that’s nonetheless seeing a rise in circumstances, “it would not be accurate to talk about a second wave,” Gatto mentioned. “What causes those peaks, and whether or not there will be more than one peak, as opposed to one continuous wave, will be human behavior and how humans react to what is going on around them.”
Were There Multiple Waves During The 1918 Influenza Epidemic?
There had been a minimum of three distinct waves of influenza in 1918 and 1919, which killed an estimated 50 million individuals worldwide. The pandemic was simultaneous with World War I, and the battle is believed to have unfold the virus across the globe extra rapidly than it in any other case would have.
The first wave started in March 1918 and eased by the summer time. The second wave got here within the fall, adopted by a 3rd wave through the winter and spring of 1919. Here’s a tough graphic from an academic paper displaying the waves in deaths:
The first wave “was not very deadly,” mentioned J. Alexander Navarro, assistant director of the Center for the History of Medicine on the University of Michigan. “It was about as bad as ordinary strains of seasonal influenza that had been circulating up until that point.”
The second wave was the deadliest, and that will have been on account of mutations that elevated the virus’s lethality, though scientists say that is speculative and that such mutations extra sometimes take for much longer to develop and unfold.
The second wave “slowed towards the end of November, in part because more stringent social distancing measures were put in place,” mentioned Kenneth Davis, creator of “More Deadly Than War: The Hidden History of the Spanish Flu and the First World War.” “When those were relaxed, a third wave commenced in the winter and spring of 1919.”
The third wave lasted into early March, and a few counsel there was a fourth wave through the winter of 1920. Each was much less lethal than the one earlier than it, Navarro mentioned, though there have been regional variations in severity.
The decline in lethality after the second wave was most likely formed partially by the declining quantity of people that hadn’t already been contaminated, Navarro mentioned. When infections in a inhabitants develop into sufficiently widespread, that may gradual the additional unfold on account of “herd immunity.”
How Much Can The 1918 Pandemic Tell Us About What To Expect Now?
While each pandemics involved an simply transmissible respiratory illness, there are some vital variations that make the 1918 pandemic much less useful in predicting the course of the novel coronavirus.
One is that the 1918 outbreak concerned influenza, which is brought on by a unique household of viruses than the coronavirus. This brings each good and dangerous information.
On the constructive facet, the coronavirus seems to be far more steady than the influenza virus, and thus much less more likely to mutate right into a extra lethal variant, mentioned Ravina Kullar, an infectious illness specialist and adjunct college member at UCLA. The coronavirus’s “spike protein,” which allows it to connect to human cells and assault them, appears to be particularly immune to mutation.
On the draw back, the coronavirus doesn’t appear to have a big seasonal side. Influenza worsens because the climate will get colder however eases up through the hotter months. While we could have seen a discount in coronavirus infections in latest weeks as a result of extra human interactions are transferring outdoor, scientists don’t anticipate the identical scale of seasonal drop-off for the coronavirus.
“What we’re seeing right now is that it’s not impacted by the climate,” Kullar mentioned. “Warm and humid places like Mumbai and Indonesia have struggled with the virus, and in the United States, cases are rising in hot states like Arizona and Florida.”
The patterns in mutations and seasonality counsel that the coronavirus could not observe the wave patterns of the 1918 flu. Instead, the unfold of the coronavirus could observe one thing extra like a plateau, with spikes attainable if social distancing isn’t adhered to completely.
There are different variations between now and 1918.
On the upside, we now know far more about viruses and public well being, and science is ready to devise focused remedies and vaccines.
On the opposite hand, the world’s inhabitants is greater and extra densely packed. In 1918, the world’s inhabitants was smaller than 2 billion, whereas at present it’s about 7.6 billion. Today, we even have industrial aviation, which might carry contaminated individuals world wide far sooner than trains and ships may in 1918.
A much bigger, denser, extra cellular inhabitants means a larger probability for a virus to proceed spreading.
In 1918, some cities noticed an easing of the pandemic as soon as they neared herd immunity, however that’s not going to be as useful with the coronavirus. Because the coronavirus is extra infectious than the 1918 virus, the share of the inhabitants wanted to succeed in herd immunity needs to be about 65% at present, in contrast with about 35% in 1918.
“In 1918, they could get through the pandemic more quickly because of that, and even so, they did it with a staggering death toll,” Navarro mentioned. “Today, the coronavirus will be with us for a lot longer.”
What Factors Could Cause A New Wave?
The greatest threat, scientists say, is a loosening of social distancing measures.
A a lot bigger portion of the economic system at present is engaged in consumer-driven commerce such because the restaurant and leisure sector. This heightens the financial strain to loosen up social distancing requirements. But doing so may worsen the pandemic.
“In 1918, once measures were lifted, the population very quickly went back to life as normal, flocking to movies, shops and stores, dance halls and saloons,” Navarro mentioned. “That led to another spike of cases in many cities.”
Nichols mentioned a neighborhood’s previous expertise with the virus could make a distinction.
In Boston, the place Nichols relies, “the first wave was relatively severe, and many people know someone who was personally affected by COVID or had a COVID-related death in the family,” she mentioned. “That affects people’s behavior. In areas where epidemic growth has been slow, the urgency of changing one’s behavior is less.”
Nichols added that experiencing the summer time, when individuals have the liberty to work together outdoor, may make it tougher to observe social distancing within the colder months.
“I fear that people will continue their summer socializing patterns into the fall and winter, turning very low-risk interactions into relatively high-risk interactions,” she mentioned.