[khn_slabs slabs=”1128680″ view=”inline” /]
[partner-box]A preferred social media put up that’s been circulating on Instagram and Facebook since April depicts the diploma to which mask-wearing interferes with the transmission of the novel coronavirus. It offers its highest “contagion probability” — a really exact 70% — to an individual who has COVID-19 however interacts with others with out carrying a masks. The lowest likelihood, 1.5%, is when masks are worn by all.
The precise percentages assigned to every state of affairs had no attribution or point out of a supply. So we wished to know if there’s any science backing up the message and the numbers — particularly as mayors, governors and members of Congress increasingly point to mask-wearing as a way to deal with the surges in coronavirus instances throughout the nation.
Doubts About The Percentages
As with so many issues on social media, it’s not clear who made this graphic or the place they received their info. Since we couldn’t begin with the supply, we reached out to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to ask if the company might level to analysis that will assist the graphic’s “contagion probability” percentages.
“We have not seen or compiled data that looks at probabilities like the ones represented in the visual you sent,” Jason McDonald, a member of CDC’s media crew, wrote in an e-mail. “Data are limited on the effectiveness of cloth face coverings in this respect and come primarily from laboratory studies.”
McDonald added that research are wanted to measure how a lot face coverings cut back transmission of COVID-19, particularly from those that have the illness however are asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic.
Other public well being specialists we consulted agreed: They weren’t conscious of any science that confirmed the numbers within the picture.
[khn_slabs slabs=”790331″ view=”inline” /]
“The data presented is bonkers and does not reflect actual human transmissions that occurred in real life with real people,” Peter Chin-Hong, a professor of medication on the University of California-San Francisco, wrote in an e-mail. It additionally doesn’t replicate something simulated in a lab, he added.
Andrew Lover, an assistant professor of epidemiology on the University of Massachusetts Amherst, agreed. He had seen an identical graphic on Facebook earlier than we interviewed him and finished some fact-checking on his personal.
“We simply don’t have data to say this,” he wrote in an e-mail. “It would require transmission models in animals or very detailed movement tracking with documented mask use (in large populations).”
Because COVID-19 is a comparatively new illness, there have been solely restricted observational research on masks use, stated Lover. The research have been performed in China and Taiwan, he added, and principally checked out self-reported masks use.
Research relating to different viral illnesses, although, signifies masks are efficient at lowering the variety of viral particles a sick particular person releases. Inhaling viral particles is usually how respiratory illnesses are unfold.
[khn_slabs slabs=”1128729″ view=”pull-right” /]
One recent study discovered that individuals who had completely different coronaviruses (not COVID-19) and wore a surgical masks breathed fewer viral particles into their setting, which means there was much less threat of transmitting the illness. And a current meta-analysis study funded by the World Health Organization discovered that, for most of the people, the chance of an infection is diminished if face masks are worn, even when the masks are disposable surgical masks or cotton masks.
The Sentiment Is On Target
Though the specialists stated it’s clear the odds introduced on this social media picture don’t maintain as much as scrutiny, they agreed that the final concept is correct.
“We get the most protection if both parties wear masks,” Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech who research viral air droplet transmission, wrote in an e-mail. She was talking about transmission of COVID-19 in addition to different respiratory diseases.
Chin-Hong went even additional. “Bottom line,” he wrote in his e-mail, “everyone should wear a mask and stop debating who might have [the virus] and who doesn’t.”
Marr additionally defined that fabric masks are higher at outward safety — blocking droplets launched by the wearer — than inward safety — blocking the wearer from inhaling others’ exhaled droplets.
“The main reason that the masks do better in the outward direction is that the droplets/aerosols released from the wearer’s nose and mouth haven’t had a chance to undergo evaporation and shrinkage before they hit the mask,” wrote Marr. “It’s easier for the fabric to block the droplets/aerosols when they’re larger rather than after they have had a chance to shrink while they’re traveling through the air.”
So, the picture can be proper when it implies there’s much less threat of transmission of the illness if a COVID-positive particular person wears a masks.
“In terms of public health messaging, it’s giving the right message. It just might be overly exact in terms of the relative risk,” stated Lover. “As a rule of thumb, the more people wearing masks, the better it is for population health.”
Public well being specialists urge widespread use of masks as a result of these with COVID-19 can typically be asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic — which means they might be unaware they’ve the illness, however might nonetheless unfold it. Wearing a masks might intervene with that unfold.
Our Ruling
A viral social media picture claims to indicate “contagion probabilities” in several eventualities relying on whether or not masks are worn.
Experts agreed the picture does convey an concept that’s proper: Wearing a masks is prone to intervene with the unfold of COVID-19.
But, though this message has a touch of accuracy, the picture leaves out vital particulars and context, particularly the supply for the contagion possibilities it seeks as an example. Experts stated proof for the precise possibilities doesn’t exist.
We price it Mostly False.
This story may be republished without cost (details). A preferred social media put up that’s been circulating on Instagram and Facebook since April depicts the diploma to which mask-wearing interferes with the transmission of the novel coronavirus. It offers its highest “contagion probability” — a really exact 70% — to an individual who has COVID-19 however interacts with others with out carrying a masks. The lowest likelihood, 1.5%, is when masks are worn by all.
The precise percentages assigned to every state of affairs had no attribution or point out of a supply. So we wished to know if there’s any science backing up the message and the numbers — particularly as mayors, governors and members of Congress increasingly point to mask-wearing as a way to deal with the surges in coronavirus instances throughout the nation.
Doubts About The Percentages
As with so many issues on social media, it’s not clear who made this graphic or the place they received their info. Since we couldn’t begin with the supply, we reached out to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to ask if the company might level to analysis that will assist the graphic’s “contagion probability” percentages.
“We have not seen or compiled data that looks at probabilities like the ones represented in the visual you sent,” Jason McDonald, a member of CDC’s media crew, wrote in an e-mail. “Data are limited on the effectiveness of cloth face coverings in this respect and come primarily from laboratory studies.”
McDonald added that research are wanted to measure how a lot face coverings cut back transmission of COVID-19, particularly from those that have the illness however are asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic.
Other public well being specialists we consulted agreed: They weren’t conscious of any science that confirmed the numbers within the picture.
“The data presented is bonkers and does not reflect actual human transmissions that occurred in real life with real people,” Peter Chin-Hong, a professor of medication on the University of California-San Francisco, wrote in an e-mail. It additionally doesn’t replicate something simulated in a lab, he added.
Andrew Lover, an assistant professor of epidemiology on the University of Massachusetts Amherst, agreed. He had seen an identical graphic on Facebook earlier than we interviewed him and finished some fact-checking on his personal.
“We simply don’t have data to say this,” he wrote in an e-mail. “It would require transmission models in animals or very detailed movement tracking with documented mask use (in large populations).”
Because COVID-19 is a comparatively new illness, there have been solely restricted observational research on masks use, stated Lover. The research have been performed in China and Taiwan, he added, and principally checked out self-reported masks use.
Research relating to different viral illnesses, although, signifies masks are efficient at lowering the variety of viral particles a sick particular person releases. Inhaling viral particles is usually how respiratory illnesses are unfold.
One recent study discovered that individuals who had completely different coronaviruses (not COVID-19) and wore a surgical masks breathed fewer viral particles into their setting, which means there was much less threat of transmitting the illness. And a current meta-analysis study funded by the World Health Organization discovered that, for most of the people, the chance of an infection is diminished if face masks are worn, even when the masks are disposable surgical masks or cotton masks.
The Sentiment Is On Target
Though the specialists stated it’s clear the odds introduced on this social media picture don’t maintain as much as scrutiny, they agreed that the final concept is correct.
“We get the most protection if both parties wear masks,” Linsey Marr, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech who research viral air droplet transmission, wrote in an e-mail. She was talking about transmission of COVID-19 in addition to different respiratory diseases.
Chin-Hong went even additional. “Bottom line,” he wrote in his e-mail, “everyone should wear a mask and stop debating who might have [the virus] and who doesn’t.”
Marr additionally defined that fabric masks are higher at outward safety — blocking droplets launched by the wearer — than inward safety — blocking the wearer from inhaling others’ exhaled droplets.
“The main reason that the masks do better in the outward direction is that the droplets/aerosols released from the wearer’s nose and mouth haven’t had a chance to undergo evaporation and shrinkage before they hit the mask,” wrote Marr. “It’s easier for the fabric to block the droplets/aerosols when they’re larger rather than after they have had a chance to shrink while they’re traveling through the air.”
So, the picture can be proper when it implies there’s much less threat of transmission of the illness if a COVID-positive particular person wears a masks.
“In terms of public health messaging, it’s giving the right message. It just might be overly exact in terms of the relative risk,” stated Lover. “As a rule of thumb, the more people wearing masks, the better it is for population health.”
Public well being specialists urge widespread use of masks as a result of these with COVID-19 can typically be asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic — which means they might be unaware they’ve the illness, however might nonetheless unfold it. Wearing a masks might intervene with that unfold.
Our Ruling
A viral social media picture claims to indicate “contagion probabilities” in several eventualities relying on whether or not masks are worn.
Experts agreed the picture does convey an concept that’s proper: Wearing a masks is prone to intervene with the unfold of COVID-19.
But, though this message has a touch of accuracy, the picture leaves out vital particulars and context, particularly the supply for the contagion possibilities it seeks as an example. Experts stated proof for the precise possibilities doesn’t exist.
We price it Mostly False.
